FUJITSU LifeBook AH502 Battery pk ASUS K550CA K550CB X750JA X750JB Battery

Published on by zone

I believe we are very concerned about ASUS K550C notebook cooling performance, here we have the actual test. Our testing method is still at room temperature at 28 degrees Celsius, so this notebook running Furmark pager software, allowing GPU operate at a higher load, almost running at full speed. Then, after more than an hour, respectively, see this notebook's internal core temperature and body surface temperature.


How to determine the thermal performance is good or bad, the maximum temperature not represent anything. Absolute temperature cooling vents is the highest, if not, that is the only show that thermal problems. When most of the heat accumulation in the cooling vents near the position, and the other parts of the temperature is not higher than 40 ℃, it can determine the cooling system design is more reasonable. Most aircraft have accumulated in the heat dissipation vent position, the palm rest and keyboard area of ​​heat slightly, in the actual experience in a more appropriate comfort, the touchpad is slightly hotter. Overall thermal design ASUS K550C with 4cell ASUS K550CA Battery this problem, but the fuselage surface deposition indeed a lot of calories.


ASUS K550C Although this is a business, but the aircraft was equipped with AMD Radeon HD 8750M discrete graphics, the aircraft's performance in gaming performance should also be good. AMD Radeon HD 8750M is AMD's latest HD 8000 series graphics cards, and from the parameters, we found that the card is equipped with 2GB DDR3 dedicated graphics memory. By 3DMark Vantage test, and found that this GPU score alone was 26,314, compared with the previous generation GT 640M DDR3 memory version of the performance almost.


In 3DMark 11 tests, P2022 test results have to score better than the GT 640M, GT 750M compared to the mainstream and 30% of the gap, on the whole fairly decent piece of graphics performance. ASUS K550C nature is relatively standard business laptop, the machine uses APU platform hardware configuration is relatively rare in the market, in general appearance of this product is simple, slightly a little game character.


In the hardware configuration, this got this ASUS X750J with ASUS X750JA Battery and 32nm process technology with the AMD A8-5550M quad-core processor, equipped with 750GB hard drive, as well as high-speed single 4GB DDR3 1600MHz memory, graphics cards, the model uses a process fusion device comes with HD 8550G single display with AMD Radeon HD 8750M discrete graphics (because the software does not recognize the compatibility issues with significant independence). AMD A8-5550M quad-core processor is the latest AMD APU, has four cores and supports four threads. The processor is based on 32nm process technology, codenamed Richland, clocked at 3.1GHz, the shared secondary cache to 2MB.


Learn basic information about the processor, we use software CINEBENCH R10 to assess its performance, the software is capable of single-core and multi-core processor performance given visual score, Fengyun AMD A8-5550M quad-core processor quickly completed all the test content, and ultimately get 3042 points its single-core, multicore get 8084 points, belonging to the mainstream mobile processor models. Another use of this software CINEBENCH 11.5 evaluate its performance, the software is capable of single-core and multi-core processor performance given visual score, Fengyun AMD A8-5550M quad-core processor quickly completed all testing content, and ultimately CPU obtains 2.02 pts, single core 0.79pts.


Undoubtedly, Microsoft Windows 8 release has sounded the clarion touch laptop popularity, despite the current Windows 8 operating system can not be perfect in some ways, but a revolutionary touch experience already been widely accepted. Following the mainstream smart phone and tablet PC, notebook also keep up with the rapid transformation of the man-machine interactive touch "large forces." So far, the world's leading notebook manufacturers have to touch the main energy into the design and development among notebooks. Compare all notebook manufacturers of new propulsion speed, ASUS's ASUS K550CC Battery Touch The update rate is most rapid.

Tired of watching the current 1366 × 768 screen resolution and TN panel users have few, although the popularity score screen is still being debated this topic, but IPS touch screen is undoubtedly the future development of an inevitable direction, by virtue of its wide viewing angle characteristics and more accurate color performance, widely recognized by consumers. However, the large size of the IPS panels cost is still high, and this is resulting in most notebook manufacturers can not fully adopted the most important reason.


Hardware configuration determines overall performance notebook, two notebook platform under the memory and hard drive are identical, the only difference is the processor, we first Windows 8 performance evaluation through comparison, look at each child two laptops on the actual performance? Windows 8 system performance evaluation can be very intuitive to see the hardware performance. We choose to run Windows 8 system direct hardware detection system, through the five tests, you can see the notebook platform equipped with Celeron 1007U composite score of 4.4 points, while the A6-1450 platform composite score of 3.9 points, including Celeron 1007U calculations per second ability to obtain 5.5 points, A6-1450 4.8 points, compared to Celeron 1007U processing capabilities stronger.


CINEBENCH is a recognized benchmark software, the majority of the mainstream media at home and abroad performance test system can be seen in its presence. It uses the company's film and television industry, Cinema 4D special effects engine, you can test the CPU and graphics performance. Wherein the single core and multi-core test pieces score is calculated separately, in addition, it also provides a test of OpenGL. In all the common CINEBENCH R10 test, which only considered a single-core processor capability, but also tested multi-core processing power. Finally we can see, A6-1450 1387 mononuclear access points, 4477 points to get multi-core, and Celeron monocytes obtained 1007U 2501 points, 4764 points to obtain multi-core. Two comparison of test results, Celeron 1007U higher than A6-1450, especially single-core processing capabilities beyond the A6-1450 nearly doubled.

Before the formal test, let's first look at the hardware platform. The choice of two mainstream notebooks, the hardware configuration of the basic books less, the three notebook hardware memory and hard drive are identical, the only difference is the presence of processor core, AMD platform configuration A6-1450 APU, it has four physical cores, clocked at 1.5GHz, and Celeron 1007U, clocked at 1.4GHz, has two cores. Both processors are low power, low voltage, so performance is weaker compared to mainstream processors. The following test items are relatively lightweight side, testing the main consideration and comparison tests between the Celeron processor and AMD A6 everyday office performance and operating efficiency.


This is to introduce ASUS X750 with 6cell ASUS X750JB Battery  is a 17.3 inches IPS 1080P Full HD touch notebook, this parameter should be a lot of screens eager to enhance the visual users want to see. This notebook is regarded as a continuity of the product, with the previous evaluation U38DT compared to the overall mold is not much different. Just the screen and hardware configurations to conduct a comprehensive update.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M GT 700M is a higher position in the series graphics card, its 3DMark VANTAGE E mode GPU score 43,282, higher than the A502 is equipped with GT650M 6000 pay would have been the previous generation of the A502 dual card mode at the same level, even higher than the GTX 660M. In 3Dmark 11 tests, AH502 score also has a large advantage, but only whether it is 3Dmark VANTAGE or 3Dmark 11, tested on A502 when a certain portion of its CPU bias, which leads to abnormally high total score of A502, However, no impact on the GPU project.


As a 14-inch gaming notebook, FUJITSU AH502 with FUJITSU LifeBook AH502 Battery performance is quite good, either CPU or graphics card have reached a higher level, while 1TB hard drive provides ample storage space, UltraBay notebook expansion modules added playability, provide users with a richer selection from these terms, AH502 will indeed small Y sturdy myth continues.

Published on Notebook Review

Comment on this post